It Sounds Insane

https://youtu.be/7s961urhXEo?si=uMLnUwGTxMZrnyX3

But . . .

Regarding Digital: the solution saying "AI is just editing stuff" canNOT explain it all.

A few years back, I had come across two HUGE mistakes, regarding hungarian history - a subject I know a little of. Mind you, they were NOT some minor mistakes which I, admittably not a world-level expert, might just remember wrong, like some name of some prince from 800 years ago. No, these two misrakes are massive:

1 - When was the first (out of two) Turkish siege of Vienna?

Every source would tell you it was back on 1529, right after the Turks had first defeated the hungarians, right?

WRONG, man!! The first Turkish siege of Vienna had only took place on 1575!! Not before that!! Trust me, I know - I remember reading it several times, in various different Books, throughout the Nineties.

2 - The first bridge to have connected Buda and Pest, Szechényi Lánchíd, the one with Karl Adám's Lions - When was it completed and opened?

ALL sources I have located during these past few years shall outrageously claim, that it was back on 1842 = before the 1848 rebellion. But it is WRONG!!

As the said bridge was only completed on 1873, upon the unification of Buda, Pest, and O Buda into budapest!! And this I had not only rad, but also heard during the 125 year celebrations of it, on june 1998. I Know.

Сейчас, get this:

ALSO OLD HISTORY BOOKS, PRINTED DECADES AGO, DO SUDDENLY PRESENT THE EDITED TIMELINE "FACTS" AS THE HISTORICAL TRUTH.

Had it merely been a case of some AI malfunction, or some dumb smartass eleven year old kid, sitting at his basement and rewriting "wikipedia" pages, the relevant old History Books would still be showing us the original Truth.

And THEY DO NOT.